Rape and people with disabilities

From the November-December 2012 issue of News & Letters

Rape and the disabled

On Oct. 3 the Connecticut State Supreme Court made the inhuman and sexist decision to overturn the sexual assault conviction of a man who “had sex” with a woman who has severe cerebral palsy, with the intellectual functional equivalent to a three-year-old and who cannot verbally communicate. The Court held that, because Connecticut statutes define physical incapacity for the purpose of sexual assault as “unconscious or for any other reason…physically unable to communicate unwillingness to an act,” the rapist could not be convicted if there was any chance that the woman could have communicated her lack of consent.

According to the ruling, since the victim was capable of “biting, kicking, scratching, screeching, groaning or gesturing, ” the court ruled that she could have communicated her lack of consent despite her serious mental deficiencies.

This outrageous ruling also states that “we, like the Appellate Court, are not persuaded that the state produced any credible evidence that the victim was either unconscious or so uncommunicative that she was physically incapable of manifesting to the defendant her lack of consent to sexual intercourse at the time of the alleged sexual assault.”

Lack of physical resistance is not evidence of consent as many victims make the good judgment that physical resistance would cause the attacker to become more violent. How can someone with the intellectual equivalent of a three-year-old know that she had to kick or bite to show lack of consent? According to the Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network, lack of consent is implicit “if you were under the statutory age of consent, or if you had a mental defect.”

Anna Doroghazi, director of public policy and communication at Connecticut Sexual Assault Crisis Services, worried that the Court’s interpretation of the law ignored these concerns.

“By implying that the victim in this case should have bitten or kicked her assailant, this ruling effectively holds people with disabilities to a higher standard than the rest of the population when it comes to proving lack of consent in sexual assault cases. Failure to bite an assailant is not the same thing as consenting to sexual activity.”

Beyond all the legal jargon is the human side. Women with disabilities have more than twice the rate of rape and/or sexual assault than women without a disability. They are considered easy targets. It is unconscionable that the courts would make the distinction of saying that this victim could have somehow communicated her lack of consent. A decision like this is sick and dangerous, and encourages those who would take advantage of someone who is disabled.

—Suzanne Rose

This entry was posted in Marxist-Humanism and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Rape and people with disabilities

  1. bbecares says:

    OMG. Something that really amazed us in Europe very very often is the wierd rules that we hear from the United States….. absurd ones and inhuman sometimes. USA shows itself as the ‘most develop country’. It should be sais ‘the most economic develop’…… this poor child and her family….. cant believe.

  2. Pingback: Shattered Lives: Anna Doroghazi Talks About Sexual Assault of the Disabled | ImaginePublicity

  3. D.B Clark says:

    Reblogged this on Just Rollin' On and commented:
    This is just utterly disgusting. How in the world did this man get away with victimizing a physically disabled woman with the mental capacity of a child? The Connecticut court ruling is completely bunk, has absolutely no merit and they obviously understand nothing about people with severe physical disabilities. I am gonna be blunt, jail time isnt even a good enough punishment for the likes of an individual like this. Chemically castrate him so he cant use his filthy prick anymore!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s